{"id":3975,"date":"2016-01-18T12:01:33","date_gmt":"2016-01-18T12:01:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/?p=3975"},"modified":"2016-01-18T12:01:33","modified_gmt":"2016-01-18T12:01:33","slug":"solidworks-support-monthly-news-january-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/2016\/01\/solidworks-support-monthly-news-january-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"SOLIDWORKS Support Monthly News \u2013 January 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to this new edition of the SOLIDWORKS Support Monthly News, coauthored by members of the SOLIDWORKS Technical Support teams worldwide.<\/p>\n<h1>Vote for the best SOLIDWORKS enhancement ideas!<\/h1>\n<p>577 enhancements ideas are available for voting in the <a href=\"https:\/\/forum.solidworks.com\/community\/general\/solidworks-world-2016-top-ten-list\/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]~ideaStage[1]&amp;sortKey=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]~recentActivityDateDesc&amp;sortOrder=0\" target=\"_blank\">SOLIDWORKS World Top Ten List<\/a>. You\u2019re bound to fin many you\u2019ll adhere to. So vote for them to show your support.<\/p>\n<p>Remember the voting rules:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Any user with an active SOLIDWORKS Customer Portal login can vote. If you have only one seat of SOLIDWORKS but more than one registered user, all can vote<\/li>\n<li>Go to <a href=\"https:\/\/forum.solidworks.com\/community\/general\/solidworks-world-2016-top-ten-list\/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]~ideaStage[1]&amp;sortKey=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]~recentActivityDateDesc&amp;sortOrder=0\" target=\"_blank\">this forum <\/a> and log in to vote<\/li>\n<li>You can vote for as many ideas as you want (not just those you proposed) \u2013 no limit<\/li>\n<li>You can vote an idea up (+1) or down (-1)<\/li>\n<li>You have until January 22nd, 2016 to vote<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Top Ten List will be revealed during the SOLIDWORKS World 2016 in Dallas.<\/p>\n<p>We look forward to seeing your ideas and hope to see you there.<\/p>\n<table class=\" aligncenter\" width=\"659\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><b>Summary:<\/b><br \/>\n<strong>Today until January 22nd<\/strong>: Voting\u00a0<strong>Wednesday February 3rd<\/strong>: Top Ten List revealed<\/td>\n<td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9871 alignleft colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture49.png\" alt=\"SWW 2016\" width=\"295\" height=\"133\" \/><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h1>Thermal Bottlenecks and Shortcuts in SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation 2016<\/h1>\n<p><em>With contributions from Joe Galliera<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p>SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation 2016 introduces a couple of new thermal parameter results that are actually quite new to thermal analysis. Yes, you read that correctly, new to Thermal analysis\u2026 the whole field! <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-293 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture.jpg\" alt=\"Smiling smiley\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/><\/p>\n<p>What are they? The Bottleneck (Bn) number and the Shortcut (Sc) number. For this breakthrough, there is actually a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/patents\/US8628236\" target=\"_blank\">US Patent Pending <\/a>for Mentor Graphics and the inventors: Robin Bornoff, John Parry, Byron Blackmore and Alan Davies.<\/p>\n<p>The Bottleneck and Shortcut numbers are used primarily in electronics systems and other thermal systems.<\/p>\n<h3>The Bottleneck (Bn) number<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.electronics-cooling.com\/2014\/10\/thermal-bottlenecks-hot\/\" target=\"_blank\">In a blog post, Robin Bornoff<\/a> writes: \u201c \u2018Thermal bottleneck\u2019 [is] a well recognized phrase playing on a very obvious analogy. Despite this there were few attempts to quantify such a parameter. Spurred on by its relevance in electronic thermal design, we did just that, put hard numbers to the concept.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Bottleneck number identifies flow paths that carry high heat, while at the same time resist the flow of that heat. Definition of the Bottleneck number considers the \u2018dot product\u2019 of heat flux and temperature gradient vectors at any point per the following equation.<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"size-full wp-image-10362 aligncenter colorbox-10342\" alt=\"Bottleneck number\" width=\"278\" height=\"34\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Bn is large when:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The heat flux is large<\/li>\n<li>And the temperature gradient is large<\/li>\n<li>And the two vectors align with each other<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is true when the heat experiences a resistance in the direction of heat flow. When a lot of heat flows in a region of a design AND it has difficulty doing so, temperature rises where the heat came from.<\/p>\n<p>Knowing the location of the bottleneck helps make modifications to the design so as to let the heat flow more easily. This decreases the maximum temperature in the design.<\/p>\n<p>The correlation between high temperature and Bottleneck number is flagrant in the example below. See the capacitors:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10358 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture56.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 702px) 100vw, 702px\" srcset=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture56-300x181.png 300w, http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture56-615x371.png 615w, http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture56.png 702w\" alt=\"Comparison of Tempreature and bottleneck results\" width=\"702\" height=\"424\" \/><\/p>\n<h3>The Shortcut (Sc) number<\/h3>\n<p>The Shortcut number reveals opportunities for alternate and more efficient heat flow paths, i.e. shortcuts toward cooler areas. A shortcut opportunity exists when it is possible to add a heat flow path in order to bypass the heat to cooler areas.<br \/>\nDefinition of the Shortcut number considers the \u2018cross product\u2019 of heat flux and temperature gradient vectors at any point per the following equation.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10363 aligncenter colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture211.png\" alt=\"Screen capture2\" width=\"286\" height=\"33\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Sc is large when:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The heat flux is large<\/li>\n<li>And the temperature gradient is large<\/li>\n<li>And the two vectors are perpendicular<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is true when the heat passes in parallel to a locally colder area.<\/p>\n<p>Notes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation 2016, the Bottleneck and Shortcut results are scaled to have a range of values between 0 and 1.<\/li>\n<li>For additional details and examples, see this <a class=\"broken_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slideshare.net\/RobinBornoff\/thermal-bottlenecks-and-shortcut-opportunities-in-flother\"><span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">SlideShare presentation<\/span><\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Where to find them in SOLIDWORKS flow Simulation 2016?<\/h3>\n<p>To add Bottleneck (Bn) number and the Shortcut (Sc) number to your plots:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Click<strong> Add Parameter<\/strong> at the end of the list of visualization parameter<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10355 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture55.png\" alt=\"Screen capture\" width=\"210\" height=\"321\" \/><\/li>\n<li>In the <strong>Heat<\/strong> group select <strong>Bottleneck number<\/strong> and the <strong>ShortCut Number <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><a class=\"broken_link\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/2016\/01\/Bottleneck%20and%20Shortcut%20numbers\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10350 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture50.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 429px) 100vw, 429px\" srcset=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture50-255x300.png 255w, http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture50.png 429w\" alt=\"Screen capture\" width=\"429\" height=\"504\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h1>Noteworthy Solutions from the SOLIDWORKS Knowledge Base<\/h1>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-408 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture3.png\" alt=\"icon - SW\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> When I apply the \u201cStability Hotfix for SOLIDWORKS\u00ae 2015 SP4\u201d (solution S-070177), what do I do if an error occurs?<br \/>\n<\/b>In one instance, installation of the hotfix did not succeed because the installer could not stop the process \u2018solidworks_fs\u2019.<br \/>\nTo work around this issue, perform this steps:<br \/>\n1. Open the Windows Task Manager.<br \/>\n2. Manually stop any instances of the solidworks_fs process.<br \/>\n3. Apply the hotfix.<br \/>\n4. Restart the computer.<br \/>\nFrom Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4BBTDTQ\" target=\"_blank\">S-070214<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-408 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture3.png\" alt=\"icon - SW\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> Which SOLIDWORKS\u00ae products were moved into lower level packages with the release of the SOLIDWORKS 2016 software?<br \/>\n<\/b>The following SOLIDWORKS\u00ae products and add ins were moved to lower level packages effective with the release of the SOLIDWORKS 2016 software.<br \/>\n\u2022 SOLIDWORKS Utilities \u2013 Moves from SOLIDWORKS Professional to SOLIDWORKS Standard<br \/>\n\u2022 SOLIDWORKS FeatureWorks \u2013 Moves from SOLIDWORKS Professional to SOLIDWORKS Standard<br \/>\n\u2022 SOLIDWORKS ScanTo3D \u2013 Moves from SOLIDWORKS Premium to SOLIDWORKS Professional<br \/>\n\u2022 SOLIDWORKS TolAnalyst\u2122 \u2013 Moves from SOLIDWORKS Premium to SOLIDWORKS Professional<br \/>\n\u2022 SOLIDWORKS Assembly Costing \u2013 Moves from SOLIDWORKS Premium to SOLIDWORKS Professional<br \/>\nFrom Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4C9VVME\" target=\"_blank\">S-070272<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-405 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture1.png\" alt=\"Icon - EPDM\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> What are the recommended DPI settings when using a 4k monitor with SOLIDWORKS\u00ae Enterprise PDM 2015 \/ 2016?<br \/>\n<\/b>Some DPI configurations in Windows 7 can cause the EPDM vault explorer view to display distorted menus. This can be caused when the DPI setting is set to a DPI setting of 144 or higher, i.e. a non-default (default setting is DPI 96). This is non-reproducible in Windows 8.1 x64. Recommendations are given in Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4F8P7FI\" target=\"_blank\">S-070484<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-405 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture1.png\" alt=\"Icon - EPDM\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> After I connect a SOLIDWORKS\u00ae PDM Professional 2016 client computer to the archive server, why does a file vault not appear in the \u2018View Setup\u2019 wizard and the \u2018SOLIDWORKS PDM Administration\u2019 tool?<br \/>\n<\/b>For a SOLIDWORKS\u00ae PDM Professional (Enterprise PDM) file vault to appear in the \u2018View Setup\u2019 wizard and the \u2018SOLIDWORKS PDM Administration\u2019 tool, the installed client type must be \u2018Professional\u2019.<br \/>\nIf the client type is \u2018Standard\u2019, the \u2018View Setup\u2019 wizard and the \u2018SOLIDWORKS PDM Administration\u2019 tool will only show the \u2018Standard\u2019 type file vaults. Any \u2018Professional\u2019 type vaults will not appear in the list. Troubleshooting and resolution procedures are given in Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4CN0588\" target=\"_blank\">S-070302<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-405 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture1.png\" alt=\"Icon - EPDM\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> Is it possible to use SOLIDWORKS\u00ae add-ins or macros when running the SOLIDWORKS PDM File Version Upgrade Tool (FVUT)?<br \/>\n<\/b>Yes. Starting with the SOLIDWORKS\u00ae PDM 2016 SP0 software, it is possible to use the SOLIDWORKS add-ins or macros when running the SOLIDWORKS PDM File Version Upgrade Tool. Additionally, a hotfix is available that makes this possible in the SOLIDWORKS PDM 2015 SP3 software as well.<br \/>\nTo use SOLIDWORKS\u00ae add-ins or macros when running the SOLIDWORKS PDM File Version Upgrade Tool, see Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4E006IL\" target=\"_blank\">S-070409<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4454 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Motion-Icon.png\" alt=\"SOLIDWORKS Motion Icon\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/>\u00a0How can I transfer to the Model tab the assembly component positions shown at a specific time in a solved SOLIDWORKS\u00ae Motion study?<\/strong><br \/>\nIn SOLIDWORKS\u00ae 2016 and newer, it is possible. You can use \u201cCopy Multiple Components\u201d functionality using the simple procedure described Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4GNDWGI\" target=\"_blank\">S-070544<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-639 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Flow-Simulation-icon.png\" alt=\"icon - Flow Simulation\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> Why do I get a \u2018Monitor lost connection with solver\u2019 status message when I try to run any project in SOLIDWORKS\u00ae Flow Simulation?<\/strong><br \/>\nYour computer\u2019s firewall software or anti-virus software can block certain processes required by SOLIDWORKS\u00ae Flow Simulation. This is true even when you run locally with the \u2018Run at\u2019 drop down menu set to \u2018This computer\u2019.<br \/>\nAsk your IT department to help you with the procedure described Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4D8OHKZ\" target=\"_blank\">S-070365<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-410 colorbox-10342\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/Screen-capture4.png\" alt=\"icon - Simulation\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/> Can I link a Design Study Parameter to a\u00a0 Global Variable defined by an equation?<\/strong><br \/>\nNo. Design Study Parameters can currently only link to Global Variables that are defined by a constant value, not an equation. As a workaround, you may link Design Study Parameters to Global Variables defined by constant values, and instead create equations using Design Study Simulation Parameters. Solution Id: <a href=\"https:\/\/customerportal.solidworks.com\/eservice_enu\/start.swe?SWECmd=GotoView&amp;SWEView=SW+KBase+Solution+View+(eService)&amp;SWERF=1&amp;SWEBU=1&amp;SWEApplet0=SW+KBase+Solution+Form+Applet+(eService)&amp;SWERowId0=1-4D8OHKZ\" target=\"_blank\">S-070365<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 \u2013 \u2013 = = = o o O o o = = = \u2013 \u2013 \u2013<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s it for this month. Thanks for reading this edition of SOLIDWORKS Support News.<\/p>\n<p>Originally posted by Julien Boissat in the SOLIDWORKS Tech Blog.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to this new edition of the SOLIDWORKS Support Monthly News, coauthored by members of the SOLIDWORKS Technical Support teams worldwide. Vote for the best SOLIDWORKS enhancement ideas! 577 enhancements&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3976,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[25,26],"class_list":["post-3975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-solidworks","tag-solidworks-2","tag-support"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3975"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3975\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3977,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3975\/revisions\/3977"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solidapps.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}